Feasibility and Investigator Selection

The purpose of the Feasibility and Investigator Selection stop is to (1) perform a feasibility study/test to ensure the Clinical Trial can be successfully conducted (recruiting and retaining patients, collecting data accurately and completely, in compliance) and (2) select appropriate Principal Investigator(s) to conduct and oversee the trial for patients under their care.

DTRA_Tubestop Icons-04

Description

The availability of a suitable study population: The study population must be large enough to provide statistically significant results, and it must be representative of the population that the study is intended to benefit.

The availability of a suitable study drug or intervention: The study drug or intervention must be safe and effective, and it must be available in sufficient quantity to conduct the trial.

The availability of qualified investigators and staff: The investigators and staff must have the necessary expertise and experience to conduct the trial, and they must be available to commit the time and effort required to complete the trial. Additionally in DCT Feasibility it's important to consider:

The study design: Some study designs are more amenable to decentralized clinical trials than others. This is dependent on both the nature of the investigational product (IP) and the study assessments planned. Ideally, the protocol is designed to optimize the use of DCT technology and services. The willingness and availability of study site staff to participate in trials using DCT methods. Alternative site models may be appropriate for the trial, and must be appropriately assessed to ensure protocol compliance and appropriate conduct is possible.

The patient population: The patient population that is eligible for the study must be able/ willing to participate remotely for at least some trial visits or assessments. The goal is to ensure that the trial design aligns with patient and site preferences to allow more patients to participate.

The availability of technology: The study sites and participants must have access to the necessary technology to collect and manage data remotely. This includes electronic devices, remote monitoring systems, and data management software.

DCT-specific Considerations/Inputs

Ease of implementation and willingness to adopt by sites investigator/institution, and Regulatory Authorities/ Ethics Committees.

Verify DCT conduct capabilities: 

Changing the Norms

Global Conduct Map 

Collaborate on Regulatory Gaps 

SCRS Best Practices for Site Adoption

EMA Recommendation on Decentralized Elements in Clinical Trials

Patient Population Preferences

Consider whether the DCT methodologies planned fit with patient preferences and how to offer optionality to patients to use them.  This may be a separate feasibility study than with sites, and may be part of the Patient Input to Protocol Design stop.


Tools

SCRS Best Practices for Site Adoption 

Best Practices

Global Regulatory Conduct

Collaborate on Regulatory Gaps

Alternative Sites CoLabs

Bring Your Own Technology (BYOT)


Regulatory Documents

FDA/U.S.

U.S. FDA Final Guidance Document: Conducting Clinical Trials With Decentralized Elements Guidance for Industry, Investigators, and Other Interested Parties - September 2024

View

U.S. FDA Guidance: Digital Health Technologies for Remote Data Acquisition in Clinical Investigations

View

21 CFR Part 312 Investigational New Drug Application

View

State Telehealth Laws and Reimbursement Policies Report, Fall 2024

View

FDA Guidance on Conduct of Clinical Trials of Medical Products During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency

View

Europe/EMA

Guidance on the Management of Clinical Trials During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic

View

EMA Recommendation on Decentralized Elements in Clinical Trials

View

Reference Documents

Best Practices and Recommendations for Site Participation in Decentralized Trials

View

CTTI RECOMMENDATIONS: EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE CLINICAL TRIAL RECRUITMENT PLANNING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

View

European Forum GCP eConsent initiative - Suite of eConsent Tools

View